<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1202 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459056</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the NFAC&#039;s order that disallowed deductions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act due to the incorrect filing of the audit report in form 10BB instead of the required form 10B. The ITAT recognized the appellant&#039;s subsequent correction and found the NFAC&#039;s reliance on a now-reversed judicial precedent invalid. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify the corrected form 10B and to allow the exemptions as per law. The ITAT also addressed the incorrect dismissal by the CIT(A) and clarified that certain general grounds did not require specific adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1202 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459056</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the NFAC&#039;s order that disallowed deductions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act due to the incorrect filing of the audit report in form 10BB instead of the required form 10B. The ITAT recognized the appellant&#039;s subsequent correction and found the NFAC&#039;s reliance on a now-reversed judicial precedent invalid. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify the corrected form 10B and to allow the exemptions as per law. The ITAT also addressed the incorrect dismissal by the CIT(A) and clarified that certain general grounds did not require specific adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>