<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 55 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39394</link>
    <description>Negotiable instruments remitted through banks, post, cheques, drafts or hundies were treated as received in British India where the parties&#039; course of dealing showed acceptance of that mode of payment, so the first receipt occurred in the taxable territories and the sale proceeds were taxable under section 4(1)(a). The same principle applied to remittances from British Indian merchants and from the Textile Directorate, because posting or banking of the instruments in British India constituted receipt through the assessee&#039;s agent. For depreciation, however, the written down value of a non-resident asset had to be reduced only by depreciation actually allowed in computing income taxed in the taxable territories, not by depreciation used only for world income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 55 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39394</link>
      <description>Negotiable instruments remitted through banks, post, cheques, drafts or hundies were treated as received in British India where the parties&#039; course of dealing showed acceptance of that mode of payment, so the first receipt occurred in the taxable territories and the sale proceeds were taxable under section 4(1)(a). The same principle applied to remittances from British Indian merchants and from the Textile Directorate, because posting or banking of the instruments in British India constituted receipt through the assessee&#039;s agent. For depreciation, however, the written down value of a non-resident asset had to be reduced only by depreciation actually allowed in computing income taxed in the taxable territories, not by depreciation used only for world income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>