<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 697 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459042</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC disposed of the appeal by consent and quashed the interlocutory order of the Company Law Board, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the rival contentions. The court treated the agreed course as a fair way to bring the company petition to an expeditious conclusion, while recording that future appearance, cooperation for early disposal, and the parties&#039; contentions on inspection remained preserved and were not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 697 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459042</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC disposed of the appeal by consent and quashed the interlocutory order of the Company Law Board, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the rival contentions. The court treated the agreed course as a fair way to bring the company petition to an expeditious conclusion, while recording that future appearance, cooperation for early disposal, and the parties&#039; contentions on inspection remained preserved and were not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>