https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459041 The Court allowed the appeal, issuing injunctions against the respondents to cease using the trade name "Starlinger" for unauthorized products and restricting the manufacture of goods not covered by the original agreement. The Court found that the respondents' actions constituted a violation of intellectual property rights and emphasized the need for a fair valuation process to protect the rights of minority shareholders. The appellant was awarded costs for pursuing the proceedings, and the Court underscored the necessity for a fair valuation of shares, ensuring that the valuation reflects the true value, including goodwill associated with the trade name. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459041 The Court allowed the appeal, issuing injunctions against the respondents to cease using the trade name "Starlinger" for unauthorized products and restricting the manufacture of goods not covered by the original agreement. The Court found that the respondents' actions constituted a violation of intellectual property rights and emphasized the need for a fair valuation process to protect the rights of minority shareholders. The appellant was awarded costs for pursuing the proceedings, and the Court underscored the necessity for a fair valuation of shares, ensuring that the valuation reflects the true value, including goodwill associated with the trade name. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459041