https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762229 Recovery of outstanding tax dues was restrained while the petitioners' appeals remained pending before the appellate authority, because the Court noted prolonged appellate delay, a substantial backlog, and no effective time-bound disposal mechanism. The continued recovery steps were therefore considered inappropriate in light of the existing protection already operating against coercive action. The operative effect was that the department could not pursue recovery during the pendency of the petitions. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 08:58:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762229 Recovery of outstanding tax dues was restrained while the petitioners' appeals remained pending before the appellate authority, because the Court noted prolonged appellate delay, a substantial backlog, and no effective time-bound disposal mechanism. The continued recovery steps were therefore considered inappropriate in light of the existing protection already operating against coercive action. The operative effect was that the department could not pursue recovery during the pendency of the petitions. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762229