https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762186 Appellate interference with an interlocutory injunction is limited to cases where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and the prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury tests must all be met. On that footing, no basis was found to disturb the trial court's order. Because the development project was substantially complete, involved multiple purchasers, and was RERA-registered, the court declined to restrain construction or impose a blanket prohibition on sale activities. It accepted a protective undertaking on minimum sale price, kept the project moving, and left the parties to seek further interim relief before the arbitral tribunal under Section 17. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762186 Appellate interference with an interlocutory injunction is limited to cases where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and the prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury tests must all be met. On that footing, no basis was found to disturb the trial court's order. Because the development project was substantially complete, involved multiple purchasers, and was RERA-registered, the court declined to restrain construction or impose a blanket prohibition on sale activities. It accepted a protective undertaking on minimum sale price, kept the project moving, and left the parties to seek further interim relief before the arbitral tribunal under Section 17. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762186