<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1177 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762191</link>
    <description>Pattis and Pattas cleared after hot rolling remained eligible for exemption under the relevant excise notification because the exemption turned on processes up to, but not beyond, the cold rolling stage. Departmental clarification and prior Tribunal reasoning supported that construction, so the duty demand could not be sustained. As the principal demand failed, the consequential penalty also could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1177 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762191</link>
      <description>Pattis and Pattas cleared after hot rolling remained eligible for exemption under the relevant excise notification because the exemption turned on processes up to, but not beyond, the cold rolling stage. Departmental clarification and prior Tribunal reasoning supported that construction, so the duty demand could not be sustained. As the principal demand failed, the consequential penalty also could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>