<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1204 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762218</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice for Assessment Year 2017-18 under the new regime was held unsustainable because the limitation protected by the first proviso to Section 149(1) had already expired under the old regime. The Delhi HC applied the settled position on the revised reassessment framework and accepted that a notice under Section 148 cannot be issued where the earlier time limit had lapsed. On that basis, the order under Section 148A(d) and the notice under Section 148 were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1204 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762218</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice for Assessment Year 2017-18 under the new regime was held unsustainable because the limitation protected by the first proviso to Section 149(1) had already expired under the old regime. The Delhi HC applied the settled position on the revised reassessment framework and accepted that a notice under Section 148 cannot be issued where the earlier time limit had lapsed. On that basis, the order under Section 148A(d) and the notice under Section 148 were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>