https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762222 A writ petition challenged an ex parte GST demand order, the consequential recovery action, and notifications extending the limitation period for tax determination. The petitioner argued that, under the approved resolution plan and the governing insolvency principle, undisclosed pre-resolution claims not included in the plan do not survive against the resolution applicant. Relying on the cited Supreme Court position and the surrounding legal framework, the High Court granted interim protection and stayed the impugned order during pendency of the petition. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 May 2025 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762222 A writ petition challenged an ex parte GST demand order, the consequential recovery action, and notifications extending the limitation period for tax determination. The petitioner argued that, under the approved resolution plan and the governing insolvency principle, undisclosed pre-resolution claims not included in the plan do not survive against the resolution applicant. Relying on the cited Supreme Court position and the surrounding legal framework, the High Court granted interim protection and stayed the impugned order during pendency of the petition. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762222