https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459038 The Court set aside the impugned order disqualifying the petitioner as Director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to the lack of prior notice and in alignment with a previous Division Bench ruling. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the Court ordered the reactivation of the petitioner's Director Identification Number (DIN). The Registrar of Companies was instructed to conduct an inquiry before any further disqualification actions. All connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 08:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459038 The Court set aside the impugned order disqualifying the petitioner as Director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to the lack of prior notice and in alignment with a previous Division Bench ruling. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the Court ordered the reactivation of the petitioner's Director Identification Number (DIN). The Registrar of Companies was instructed to conduct an inquiry before any further disqualification actions. All connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459038