<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 841 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459019</link>
    <description>Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal is treated as a distinct adjudicatory body from the Regulatory Authority, with its own composition, staff, supervision and funding framework. The statutory scheme, together with the State Rules, indicates that the Tribunal must have independent budgetary support, office space, staffing and infrastructure to function effectively and preserve the statutory appeal remedy. Dependence on the Authority&#039;s financial control would undermine that separate role and frustrate effective adjudication. The State was therefore directed to make the Tribunal functional through separate financial and administrative arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 841 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459019</link>
      <description>Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal is treated as a distinct adjudicatory body from the Regulatory Authority, with its own composition, staff, supervision and funding framework. The statutory scheme, together with the State Rules, indicates that the Tribunal must have independent budgetary support, office space, staffing and infrastructure to function effectively and preserve the statutory appeal remedy. Dependence on the Authority&#039;s financial control would undermine that separate role and frustrate effective adjudication. The State was therefore directed to make the Tribunal functional through separate financial and administrative arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>