<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459026</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal deleted addition of unrealized interest on non-performing accounts, following RBI guidelines and section 43D read with rule 6EA. Recovery of bad debts written off was remanded to AO for verification of whether deduction was claimed under section 36(1)(vii). Disallowance under section 14A was restored to AO for fresh computation following SC precedent in Maxopp Investment. Interest disallowance on IPDI bonds was deleted. Addition of broken period interest expenses was deleted. The tribunal favored the assessee on accrual versus due method for securities interest, holding taxation occurs only when interest becomes due.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 19:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1640 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459026</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal deleted addition of unrealized interest on non-performing accounts, following RBI guidelines and section 43D read with rule 6EA. Recovery of bad debts written off was remanded to AO for verification of whether deduction was claimed under section 36(1)(vii). Disallowance under section 14A was restored to AO for fresh computation following SC precedent in Maxopp Investment. Interest disallowance on IPDI bonds was deleted. Addition of broken period interest expenses was deleted. The tribunal favored the assessee on accrual versus due method for securities interest, holding taxation occurs only when interest becomes due.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>