<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39379</link>
    <description>Income-tax recovery under section 222(1) and section 224(1) read with the Second Schedule is confined to the arrears covered by the certificate issued against the particular defaulter. The rules governing notice, proclamation, auction, confirmation and sale certificate do not authorise clubbing separate recovery certificates of different assessees or applying one assessee&#039;s property towards another&#039;s dues. A sale founded on such clubbing is not a mere procedural irregularity; it goes to the root of the authority to sell. The sale of the petitioner&#039;s property for the managing director&#039;s arrears was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid, and the confirmation of sale and sale deed could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39379</link>
      <description>Income-tax recovery under section 222(1) and section 224(1) read with the Second Schedule is confined to the arrears covered by the certificate issued against the particular defaulter. The rules governing notice, proclamation, auction, confirmation and sale certificate do not authorise clubbing separate recovery certificates of different assessees or applying one assessee&#039;s property towards another&#039;s dues. A sale founded on such clubbing is not a mere procedural irregularity; it goes to the root of the authority to sell. The sale of the petitioner&#039;s property for the managing director&#039;s arrears was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid, and the confirmation of sale and sale deed could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>