<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1094 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459012</link>
    <description>A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certification work must reflect reasonable skill, care and caution, including basic verification of figures before issuing a professional certificate. Gross negligence can amount to professional misconduct where the conduct shows a failure to act honestly and reasonably rather than a mere error of judgment. Here, although an incorrect export value was certified, the conduct was treated as bona fide because the mistake was promptly pointed out to the concerned party and the surrounding circumstances did not justify formal reprimand. A caution or warning was considered sufficient, and the disciplinary reference was closed without punitive action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1094 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459012</link>
      <description>A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certification work must reflect reasonable skill, care and caution, including basic verification of figures before issuing a professional certificate. Gross negligence can amount to professional misconduct where the conduct shows a failure to act honestly and reasonably rather than a mere error of judgment. Here, although an incorrect export value was certified, the conduct was treated as bona fide because the mistake was promptly pointed out to the concerned party and the surrounding circumstances did not justify formal reprimand. A caution or warning was considered sufficient, and the disciplinary reference was closed without punitive action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>