<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Workmen&#039;s Wage Claims Denied; Advised to Seek Remedy in Labour Court for Alleged Industrial Disputes Act Violations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83377</link>
    <description>In the case at hand, the workmen&#039;s claims for wages and other dues were rejected by the liquidator due to lack of evidence substantiating their employment on the date of commencement of liquidation proceedings. The corporate debtor had ceased operations in June 2010, and the appellants themselves admitted to working only until April 2012. Despite the alleged violation of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, regarding the factory closure, the NCLT and NCLAT held that the appropriate remedy was to approach the Industrial Court or Labour Court, rather than raising the issue during the liquidation process. The tribunals relied on a precedent case involving Era Labourer Union, where similar claims were rejected for lack of verification from the da.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:52:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Workmen&#039;s Wage Claims Denied; Advised to Seek Remedy in Labour Court for Alleged Industrial Disputes Act Violations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83377</link>
      <description>In the case at hand, the workmen&#039;s claims for wages and other dues were rejected by the liquidator due to lack of evidence substantiating their employment on the date of commencement of liquidation proceedings. The corporate debtor had ceased operations in June 2010, and the appellants themselves admitted to working only until April 2012. Despite the alleged violation of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, regarding the factory closure, the NCLT and NCLAT held that the appropriate remedy was to approach the Industrial Court or Labour Court, rather than raising the issue during the liquidation process. The tribunals relied on a precedent case involving Era Labourer Union, where similar claims were rejected for lack of verification from the da.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:52:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>