<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1126 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762140</link>
    <description>Section 35C(1A) of the Central Excise Act permits adjournment only for sufficient cause and bars granting adjournment more than three times during hearing of an appeal. Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules also authorises dismissal for default where the appellant does not appear or does not proceed with the hearing. Where an appeal has been repeatedly listed and the appellant has only sought adjournments, no further time is justified beyond the statutory maximum, and dismissal for non-prosecution is proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:52:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1126 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762140</link>
      <description>Section 35C(1A) of the Central Excise Act permits adjournment only for sufficient cause and bars granting adjournment more than three times during hearing of an appeal. Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules also authorises dismissal for default where the appellant does not appear or does not proceed with the hearing. Where an appeal has been repeatedly listed and the appellant has only sought adjournments, no further time is justified beyond the statutory maximum, and dismissal for non-prosecution is proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>