https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762162 The Tribunal concluded that the demand for anti-dumping duty against the appellant was time-barred due to the delayed issuance of the show cause notice, which was served in 2021 for entries made in 2016 and 2017. It determined that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as all necessary information had been disclosed during the bill of entry filing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand on the basis of being time-barred and allowed the appeal. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:52:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762162 The Tribunal concluded that the demand for anti-dumping duty against the appellant was time-barred due to the delayed issuance of the show cause notice, which was served in 2021 for entries made in 2016 and 2017. It determined that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as all necessary information had been disclosed during the bill of entry filing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand on the basis of being time-barred and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762162