<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (12) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39364</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred by an assessee-company to defend employees in criminal proceedings arising from an accident in the course of mining operations may be deductible as business expenditure if it is honestly and bona fide incurred to protect the business, its reputation and employee co-operation; the final outcome of the criminal case is not decisive. By contrast, a payment made as a penalty or fine for breach of law is not incurred for business purposes and is not deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (12) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39364</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred by an assessee-company to defend employees in criminal proceedings arising from an accident in the course of mining operations may be deductible as business expenditure if it is honestly and bona fide incurred to protect the business, its reputation and employee co-operation; the final outcome of the criminal case is not decisive. By contrast, a payment made as a penalty or fine for breach of law is not incurred for business purposes and is not deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>