https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83372 Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged that the assessee understated turnover and concealed income based on the difference between the original return and the revised return filed pursuant to a notice u/s 148 after a survey. However, the AO failed to record the original returned income and the revised returned income in the assessment order or penalty order, making it impossible to determine the concealed amount. The AO merely made a bald statement about understated turnover without substantiating the deliberate underestimation of income. Mere projected financials found during the survey and recorded statements cannot justify the penalty unless the assessee deliberately supp..... en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:49:28 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:49:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83372 Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged that the assessee understated turnover and concealed income based on the difference between the original return and the revised return filed pursuant to a notice u/s 148 after a survey. However, the AO failed to record the original returned income and the revised returned income in the assessment order or penalty order, making it impossible to determine the concealed amount. The AO merely made a bald statement about understated turnover without substantiating the deliberate underestimation of income. Mere projected financials found during the survey and recorded statements cannot justify the penalty unless the assessee deliberately supp..... Highlights Income Tax Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:49:28 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83372