https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762124 A third party with a bona fide and precise connection to alleged interference with judicial process may maintain an appeal under Article 136, and the Court accepted locus standi. The statutory bar in Section 195(1)(b) CrPC did not apply on these facts because the alleged misconduct was linked to a judicially initiated process affecting the integrity of proceedings, so the prosecution was not barred. Where the earlier quashing order was unsustainable, the Court upheld restoration of the criminal proceedings and the direction to continue the trial, recognising power to order further steps to prevent miscarriage of justice. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 17:34:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762124 A third party with a bona fide and precise connection to alleged interference with judicial process may maintain an appeal under Article 136, and the Court accepted locus standi. The statutory bar in Section 195(1)(b) CrPC did not apply on these facts because the alleged misconduct was linked to a judicially initiated process affecting the integrity of proceedings, so the prosecution was not barred. Where the earlier quashing order was unsustainable, the Court upheld restoration of the criminal proceedings and the direction to continue the trial, recognising power to order further steps to prevent miscarriage of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762124