<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Upheld: Commissioner&#039;s Revisionary Order Quashed After AO&#039;s Inquiry on Improvement Costs Deemed Adequate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83359</link>
    <description>The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The assessee&#039;s claim for cost of improvement, comprising interior work, kitchen appliances, plywood flooring, and tiles, is allowable u/s 55(1)(b)(2) as the expenses were capital in nature, enhancing the property&#039;s value. The assessee submitted a valuation report and bank statements as evidence, which the AO examined and accepted. The CIT emphasized the need for a more in-depth inquiry, citing Explanation 2 to Section 263, but Section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the inquiry was not conducted as per the CIT&#039;s preference. The AO conducted adequate inqu.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:45:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Upheld: Commissioner&#039;s Revisionary Order Quashed After AO&#039;s Inquiry on Improvement Costs Deemed Adequate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83359</link>
      <description>The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The assessee&#039;s claim for cost of improvement, comprising interior work, kitchen appliances, plywood flooring, and tiles, is allowable u/s 55(1)(b)(2) as the expenses were capital in nature, enhancing the property&#039;s value. The assessee submitted a valuation report and bank statements as evidence, which the AO examined and accepted. The CIT emphasized the need for a more in-depth inquiry, citing Explanation 2 to Section 263, but Section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the inquiry was not conducted as per the CIT&#039;s preference. The AO conducted adequate inqu.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:45:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>