<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1078 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and annulled the Commissioner&#039;s order dated 30.10.2013, granting any consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the denial of CENVAT Credit was improper due to negligible shortages and the absence of allegations of clandestine activities or excess clearance. The decision, aligning with a Supreme Court precedent, was pronounced in open court on 19.11.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1078 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and annulled the Commissioner&#039;s order dated 30.10.2013, granting any consequential relief. The Tribunal found that the denial of CENVAT Credit was improper due to negligible shortages and the absence of allegations of clandestine activities or excess clearance. The decision, aligning with a Supreme Court precedent, was pronounced in open court on 19.11.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>