https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762101 A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable where the adjudicating authority has considered the taxpayer's submissions, passed a reasoned order, and confirmed differential IGST with interest and penalty. The proper remedy in such circumstances is the statutory appeal under Section 128(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner was given liberty to file the appeal within 30 days, and the appellate authority was directed to decide it on merits and in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:45:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762101 A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable where the adjudicating authority has considered the taxpayer's submissions, passed a reasoned order, and confirmed differential IGST with interest and penalty. The proper remedy in such circumstances is the statutory appeal under Section 128(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner was given liberty to file the appeal within 30 days, and the appellate authority was directed to decide it on merits and in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762101