<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1090 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762104</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal against CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of registration under section 12AB. The trust&#039;s registration was denied based on allegations that it engaged in profit-making activities contrary to charitable purposes under section 2(15). ITAT found no evidence that trust objects were profit-oriented, noting the deed specifically stated activities would not earn profit. Regarding alleged unauthorized activities, ITAT determined events were organized by an individual, not the trust, with no expenses incurred by the trust. CIT(E) erred in concluding trust activities violated its objects. The rejection order was set aside and CIT(E) directed to register the trust in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1090 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762104</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal against CIT(E)&#039;s rejection of registration under section 12AB. The trust&#039;s registration was denied based on allegations that it engaged in profit-making activities contrary to charitable purposes under section 2(15). ITAT found no evidence that trust objects were profit-oriented, noting the deed specifically stated activities would not earn profit. Regarding alleged unauthorized activities, ITAT determined events were organized by an individual, not the trust, with no expenses incurred by the trust. CIT(E) erred in concluding trust activities violated its objects. The rejection order was set aside and CIT(E) directed to register the trust in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>