<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 19 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39348</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal was correct in relying on the disclosure made by the assessee to find gross or wilful neglect within the meaning of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that the prohibition under section 24(11) did not prevent the Tribunal from considering the disclosure for this purpose. The reference was answered against the assessee, who was directed to pay costs to the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 19 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39348</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal was correct in relying on the disclosure made by the assessee to find gross or wilful neglect within the meaning of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that the prohibition under section 24(11) did not prevent the Tribunal from considering the disclosure for this purpose. The reference was answered against the assessee, who was directed to pay costs to the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>