https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458939 A de novo trial may be ordered only where procedural violations are substantial, the accused suffers demonstrated prejudice, and the irregularity causes a failure of justice that cannot otherwise be cured. The Court treated fair trial as integral to Articles 14, 21 and 22 and stressed strict compliance with criminal procedure at remand, supply of documents, framing of charge, witness examination, defence evidence and sentencing. It also noted that video conferencing is ordinarily an exception for producing an accused, that counsel consultation must be meaningful, and that trials must not proceed in undue haste. The impugned remarks against the trial judge were not disturbed, as no separate basis for interference was shown. en-us Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:15:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458939 A de novo trial may be ordered only where procedural violations are substantial, the accused suffers demonstrated prejudice, and the irregularity causes a failure of justice that cannot otherwise be cured. The Court treated fair trial as integral to Articles 14, 21 and 22 and stressed strict compliance with criminal procedure at remand, supply of documents, framing of charge, witness examination, defence evidence and sentencing. It also noted that video conferencing is ordinarily an exception for producing an accused, that counsel consultation must be meaningful, and that trials must not proceed in undue haste. The impugned remarks against the trial judge were not disturbed, as no separate basis for interference was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458939