https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458942 The HC addressed the jurisdiction of the CCI in a case contesting its order. The petitioner claimed the CCI lacked jurisdiction due to existing Patent Act mechanisms. The Court identified a significant jurisdictional issue, noting the CCI's premature adjudication. It restrained the CCI from issuing final orders or reports until the next hearing and allowed the Director General to summon local officers for investigation, requiring permission for foreign officers. The CCI's observations were not to hinder negotiations or court proceedings. The matter was scheduled for pleadings completion before the Joint Registrar. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458942 The HC addressed the jurisdiction of the CCI in a case contesting its order. The petitioner claimed the CCI lacked jurisdiction due to existing Patent Act mechanisms. The Court identified a significant jurisdictional issue, noting the CCI's premature adjudication. It restrained the CCI from issuing final orders or reports until the next hearing and allowed the Director General to summon local officers for investigation, requiring permission for foreign officers. The CCI's observations were not to hinder negotiations or court proceedings. The matter was scheduled for pleadings completion before the Joint Registrar. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458942