https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458965 Whether proceedings under Section 129 of the Karnataka GST Act must precede confiscation proceedings under Section 130 is treated as a contested procedural issue, with one side asserting sequential dependence and the other maintaining that the remedies are independent and mutually exclusive. The petition was directed for further consideration, and pending final hearing the court ordered interim release of the goods and conveyance on deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs, subject to the petition's final outcome. The document therefore records an interim arrangement rather than a final determination on the interaction between Sections 129 and 130. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2025 23:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458965 Whether proceedings under Section 129 of the Karnataka GST Act must precede confiscation proceedings under Section 130 is treated as a contested procedural issue, with one side asserting sequential dependence and the other maintaining that the remedies are independent and mutually exclusive. The petition was directed for further consideration, and pending final hearing the court ordered interim release of the goods and conveyance on deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs, subject to the petition's final outcome. The document therefore records an interim arrangement rather than a final determination on the interaction between Sections 129 and 130. Case-Laws GST Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458965