<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 989 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762003</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed appeals challenging denial of CENVAT credit and penalties imposed on three appellants. The tribunal found that the entire case was based solely on one appellant&#039;s statement without corroborative evidence. The revenue alleged evasion through non-receipt of pig iron and misuse of CENVAT credit facility. However, the authorized representative of the third appellant never admitted any transactions with the first appellant, and goods received were used in manufacturing dutiable final products. The tribunal held that demand cannot be raised based on third-party statements alone without supporting evidence, setting aside penalties against all appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 989 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762003</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed appeals challenging denial of CENVAT credit and penalties imposed on three appellants. The tribunal found that the entire case was based solely on one appellant&#039;s statement without corroborative evidence. The revenue alleged evasion through non-receipt of pig iron and misuse of CENVAT credit facility. However, the authorized representative of the third appellant never admitted any transactions with the first appellant, and goods received were used in manufacturing dutiable final products. The tribunal held that demand cannot be raised based on third-party statements alone without supporting evidence, setting aside penalties against all appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>