<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 995 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762009</link>
    <description>The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 was described as available to the Enforcement Directorate where acceptance of a closure report in the predicate offence would frustrate PMLA proceedings based on identified proceeds of crime. The Court reasoned that the ED had sufficient locus because the impugned closure directly affected tracing and confiscation of tainted assets, and that ante-dating of the sale agreement, if established on the record, indicated fabrication and forgery. The mechanically accepted closure report was held contrary to the materials and productive of miscarriage of justice, so the acceptance order was quashed and the predicate offence permitted to continue in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 995 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762009</link>
      <description>The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 was described as available to the Enforcement Directorate where acceptance of a closure report in the predicate offence would frustrate PMLA proceedings based on identified proceeds of crime. The Court reasoned that the ED had sufficient locus because the impugned closure directly affected tracing and confiscation of tainted assets, and that ante-dating of the sale agreement, if established on the record, indicated fabrication and forgery. The mechanically accepted closure report was held contrary to the materials and productive of miscarriage of justice, so the acceptance order was quashed and the predicate offence permitted to continue in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>