https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762010 The HC dismissed a criminal petition challenging money laundering charges. The petitioner argued that properties purchased before the alleged scheduled offense could not constitute proceeds of crime. The court held that since proceeds of crime were properly identified in the complaint, the petitioner's grounds lacked merit. The court directed that all substantive issues regarding evidence appreciation should be determined by the trial court, which must consider materials independently without being influenced by the HC's factual findings in this petition. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762010 The HC dismissed a criminal petition challenging money laundering charges. The petitioner argued that properties purchased before the alleged scheduled offense could not constitute proceeds of crime. The court held that since proceeds of crime were properly identified in the complaint, the petitioner's grounds lacked merit. The court directed that all substantive issues regarding evidence appreciation should be determined by the trial court, which must consider materials independently without being influenced by the HC's factual findings in this petition. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762010