<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1038 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762052</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the appellate order&#039;s rejection of an appeal on technical grounds. The court found the dismissal unjustifiable, particularly after the retrospective amendment to Rule 108. HC set aside the appellate order and directed restoration of the appeal for merit-based consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness over hyper-technical interpretations of filing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1038 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762052</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the appellate order&#039;s rejection of an appeal on technical grounds. The court found the dismissal unjustifiable, particularly after the retrospective amendment to Rule 108. HC set aside the appellate order and directed restoration of the appeal for merit-based consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness over hyper-technical interpretations of filing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>