https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458908 Writ interference was declined because the dispute-resolution scheme under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provided an adequate statutory route through conciliation, arbitration and subsequent remedies, with no exceptional ground shown to bypass it. The respondent's status as a supplier was upheld on the basis of prior registration and the record, so the objection to the Facilitation Council's jurisdiction failed and the statutory reference was treated as valid. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:30:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458908 Writ interference was declined because the dispute-resolution scheme under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provided an adequate statutory route through conciliation, arbitration and subsequent remedies, with no exceptional ground shown to bypass it. The respondent's status as a supplier was upheld on the basis of prior registration and the record, so the objection to the Facilitation Council's jurisdiction failed and the statutory reference was treated as valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458908