https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458915 A rectification complaint under Section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as within limitation because the last day for filing fell on a Sunday and the application was filed on the next working day. The Court applied the rule that when the final day is a holiday, the act may be done on reopening day, and rejected the delay objection. It also held that rectification under the Companies Act operates independently of trade mark infringement proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, so the pendency or outcome of the trade mark suit did not bar exercise of the rectification power. The direction to change the company name was therefore left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:30:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458915 A rectification complaint under Section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 was treated as within limitation because the last day for filing fell on a Sunday and the application was filed on the next working day. The Court applied the rule that when the final day is a holiday, the act may be done on reopening day, and rejected the delay objection. It also held that rectification under the Companies Act operates independently of trade mark infringement proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, so the pendency or outcome of the trade mark suit did not bar exercise of the rectification power. The direction to change the company name was therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458915