<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458918</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction may be excluded where a special statute creates the right and supplies a complete mechanism for inquiry, relief and enforcement. The text explains that complaints of abuse of dominance, unfair billing and payment-term violations were treated as matters for the Competition Commission and the Reserve Bank under the Competition Act, 2002 and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, so a civil suit was not maintainable and rejection of the plaint was upheld. It also states that a contractual clause selecting foreign courts cannot oust Indian court jurisdiction where the dispute concerns business in India and Indian statutory rights, because such exclusion operates as a restraint on legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458918</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction may be excluded where a special statute creates the right and supplies a complete mechanism for inquiry, relief and enforcement. The text explains that complaints of abuse of dominance, unfair billing and payment-term violations were treated as matters for the Competition Commission and the Reserve Bank under the Competition Act, 2002 and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, so a civil suit was not maintainable and rejection of the plaint was upheld. It also states that a contractual clause selecting foreign courts cannot oust Indian court jurisdiction where the dispute concerns business in India and Indian statutory rights, because such exclusion operates as a restraint on legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>