<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1456 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458919</link>
    <description>A judicial or quasi-judicial body must comply with an express superior court direction once it has been apprised of it; a judgment pronounced in wilful disregard of that direction cannot stand. The technical member&#039;s unconditional apology was accepted, the judicial member&#039;s explanation was censured as contrary to the record, and costs were imposed on the scrutiniser and the concerned private respondent for acting in concert to delay the AGM result. The impugned appellate judgment was set aside and the underlying appeal was remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted bench, with no determination on the merits of the corporate dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 19:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1456 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458919</link>
      <description>A judicial or quasi-judicial body must comply with an express superior court direction once it has been apprised of it; a judgment pronounced in wilful disregard of that direction cannot stand. The technical member&#039;s unconditional apology was accepted, the judicial member&#039;s explanation was censured as contrary to the record, and costs were imposed on the scrutiniser and the concerned private respondent for acting in concert to delay the AGM result. The impugned appellate judgment was set aside and the underlying appeal was remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted bench, with no determination on the merits of the corporate dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>