<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds Breach of Natural Justice in GST Case Due to Inadequate Notice; Order Set Aside for Further Response.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83296</link>
    <description>The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the notices were uploaded on the &quot;view additional notices and orders&quot; tab of the GST portal, and the petitioner was unaware of the proceedings. The impugned order pertained to discrepancies between the petitioner&#039;s GSTR-3B return, auto-populated GSTR-2A, and reconciliation of turnover as per the Income Tax return and GSTR-3B return. The tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to reply to the show cause notice. Considering these circumstances, the High Court set aside the impugned order dated 9-8-2023 on the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause notice within the same period. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds Breach of Natural Justice in GST Case Due to Inadequate Notice; Order Set Aside for Further Response.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83296</link>
      <description>The High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the notices were uploaded on the &quot;view additional notices and orders&quot; tab of the GST portal, and the petitioner was unaware of the proceedings. The impugned order pertained to discrepancies between the petitioner&#039;s GSTR-3B return, auto-populated GSTR-2A, and reconciliation of turnover as per the Income Tax return and GSTR-3B return. The tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to reply to the show cause notice. Considering these circumstances, the High Court set aside the impugned order dated 9-8-2023 on the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks and submits a reply to the show cause notice within the same period. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>