https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761945 The Competition Commission of India concluded that there was no prima facie evidence of contravention of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, regarding alleged cartelization in a tender process by the accused parties. After reviewing the submitted documents, the Commission determined that the evidence did not substantiate claims of collusion or bid rigging. As a result, the Commission decided to close the case under Section 26(2) of the Act, instructing the Secretary to notify the informant of this decision. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761945 The Competition Commission of India concluded that there was no prima facie evidence of contravention of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, regarding alleged cartelization in a tender process by the accused parties. After reviewing the submitted documents, the Commission determined that the evidence did not substantiate claims of collusion or bid rigging. As a result, the Commission decided to close the case under Section 26(2) of the Act, instructing the Secretary to notify the informant of this decision. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761945