https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761947 The Commission concluded that the case, centered on disciplinary actions by chess associations against the Informant for organizing an unauthorized tournament, did not present any competition concerns under the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission determined that no contravention of the Act warranted an investigation, leading to the closure of the matter under Section 26(2) of the Act. No interim relief was necessary under Section 33, and the decision was communicated to the Informant, emphasizing the focus on disciplinary proceedings rather than competition law violations. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761947 The Commission concluded that the case, centered on disciplinary actions by chess associations against the Informant for organizing an unauthorized tournament, did not present any competition concerns under the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission determined that no contravention of the Act warranted an investigation, leading to the closure of the matter under Section 26(2) of the Act. No interim relief was necessary under Section 33, and the decision was communicated to the Informant, emphasizing the focus on disciplinary proceedings rather than competition law violations. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761947