https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761948 The CCI examined allegations of abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, regarding unilateral changes in housekeeping staff allotment and increased maintenance charges. The CCI determined that the opposite parties qualified as enterprises under Section 2(h) as they undertook commercial activities. The relevant geographic market was defined as Bangalore Metropolitan Region, and the relevant product market as provision of services for development and sale of apartments catering to senior citizens in that region. After analyzing the market delineation and dominance factors under Section 19(4), the CCI found no prima facie case of contravention and closed the information under Section 26(2), rejecting relief claims under Section 33. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761948 The CCI examined allegations of abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, regarding unilateral changes in housekeeping staff allotment and increased maintenance charges. The CCI determined that the opposite parties qualified as enterprises under Section 2(h) as they undertook commercial activities. The relevant geographic market was defined as Bangalore Metropolitan Region, and the relevant product market as provision of services for development and sale of apartments catering to senior citizens in that region. After analyzing the market delineation and dominance factors under Section 19(4), the CCI found no prima facie case of contravention and closed the information under Section 26(2), rejecting relief claims under Section 33. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761948