<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 940 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761954</link>
    <description>CCI dismissed allegations against Google for abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act, 2002. Informant alleged Google granted exclusive access to Truecaller for sharing private contact information while prohibiting other apps. CCI found users voluntarily provided contact details to Truecaller and informant failed to establish prima facie case showing Google accorded preferential treatment or engaged in discriminatory practices. No evidence demonstrated Google allowed Truecaller exclusive access while denying competing applications. Information ordered closed under Section 26(2) and relief under Section 33 rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 940 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761954</link>
      <description>CCI dismissed allegations against Google for abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of Competition Act, 2002. Informant alleged Google granted exclusive access to Truecaller for sharing private contact information while prohibiting other apps. CCI found users voluntarily provided contact details to Truecaller and informant failed to establish prima facie case showing Google accorded preferential treatment or engaged in discriminatory practices. No evidence demonstrated Google allowed Truecaller exclusive access while denying competing applications. Information ordered closed under Section 26(2) and relief under Section 33 rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>