https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761956 The Commission concluded that there was no prima facie case of contravention of the Competition Act, 2002, against any of the parties involved. The grievances presented by the Informant were deemed to primarily pertain to individual or contractual issues, such as misrepresentation and service deficiencies, rather than significant competition concerns. Consequently, the Commission decided to close the matter under Section 26(2) of the Act and advised the Informant to seek redressal through appropriate legal channels. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant, thereby concluding the proceedings. en-us Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761956 The Commission concluded that there was no prima facie case of contravention of the Competition Act, 2002, against any of the parties involved. The grievances presented by the Informant were deemed to primarily pertain to individual or contractual issues, such as misrepresentation and service deficiencies, rather than significant competition concerns. Consequently, the Commission decided to close the matter under Section 26(2) of the Act and advised the Informant to seek redressal through appropriate legal channels. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant, thereby concluding the proceedings. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761956