<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 943 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761957</link>
    <description>CCI dismissed the case against port logistics service providers at Visakhapatnam Port for alleged abuse of dominant position. The informant complained about lease agreement disguised as license agreement to avoid stamp duty, enforcement of lock-in clauses, refusal to adjust rental arrears against security deposit, and threats regarding power supply and security deposit forfeiture. CCI held that disguising lease as license agreement to avoid stamp duty is not a competition issue under the Competition Act, 2002. The alleged conduct did not raise competition concerns or constitute prima facie contravention of Sections 3 and 4. Information was closed under Section 26(2) without investigation, and no relief under Section 33 was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 943 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761957</link>
      <description>CCI dismissed the case against port logistics service providers at Visakhapatnam Port for alleged abuse of dominant position. The informant complained about lease agreement disguised as license agreement to avoid stamp duty, enforcement of lock-in clauses, refusal to adjust rental arrears against security deposit, and threats regarding power supply and security deposit forfeiture. CCI held that disguising lease as license agreement to avoid stamp duty is not a competition issue under the Competition Act, 2002. The alleged conduct did not raise competition concerns or constitute prima facie contravention of Sections 3 and 4. Information was closed under Section 26(2) without investigation, and no relief under Section 33 was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>