https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761959 Compliance with telecom regulation was held to operate independently from competition law, so the mere ence of a sectoral regulator did not oust CCI jurisdiction or require a reference under Section 21A. The Commission treated such reference as discretionary and found no need to invoke it. On the merits, it defined the relevant market as internet exchange services in India and found the market contestable, with no material showing that the opposite party could influence the market in its favour. As dominance was not established, the allegations of predatory pricing and denial of market access were not pursued and the competition complaint was closed at the threshold. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761959 Compliance with telecom regulation was held to operate independently from competition law, so the mere ence of a sectoral regulator did not oust CCI jurisdiction or require a reference under Section 21A. The Commission treated such reference as discretionary and found no need to invoke it. On the merits, it defined the relevant market as internet exchange services in India and found the market contestable, with no material showing that the opposite party could influence the market in its favour. As dominance was not established, the allegations of predatory pricing and denial of market access were not pursued and the competition complaint was closed at the threshold. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761959