https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761960 The Commission determined that the allegations against the hospital specializing in infertility care did not constitute a violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The claims of misleading statements on social media regarding IVF treatment costs were deemed insufficient to warrant an investigation. Consequently, the Commission closed the Information under Section 26(2) of the Act, and no interim relief or further action was granted to the Informant under Section 33. The decision was communicated to the Informant, concluding that no contravention of the Act had occurred. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761960 The Commission determined that the allegations against the hospital specializing in infertility care did not constitute a violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The claims of misleading statements on social media regarding IVF treatment costs were deemed insufficient to warrant an investigation. Consequently, the Commission closed the Information under Section 26(2) of the Act, and no interim relief or further action was granted to the Informant under Section 33. The decision was communicated to the Informant, concluding that no contravention of the Act had occurred. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761960