<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1573 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458883</link>
    <description>A second appeal against the first appellate court&#039;s confirmation of the trial court&#039;s dismissal, together with costs, was found not maintainable because the appellate court had decided the matter on merits. The High Court held that no substantial question of law or other basis was shown to justify admission of the second appeal, and the order imposing costs after due consideration was sustained. The appeal was therefore dismissed as devoid of grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1573 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458883</link>
      <description>A second appeal against the first appellate court&#039;s confirmation of the trial court&#039;s dismissal, together with costs, was found not maintainable because the appellate court had decided the matter on merits. The High Court held that no substantial question of law or other basis was shown to justify admission of the second appeal, and the order imposing costs after due consideration was sustained. The appeal was therefore dismissed as devoid of grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>