https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458884 In proceedings under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court treated objections based on a consent letter, receipt of payment and alleged staleness of the claim as issues bearing on arbitrability and the effect of disputed facts. It held that such adjudicatory questions fall within the arbitral tribunal's domain and should not be examined at the appointment stage where an arbitration clause exists. The Court therefore rejected the objection to appointment and appointed a sole arbitrator to decide the disputes. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458884 In proceedings under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court treated objections based on a consent letter, receipt of payment and alleged staleness of the claim as issues bearing on arbitrability and the effect of disputed facts. It held that such adjudicatory questions fall within the arbitral tribunal's domain and should not be examined at the appointment stage where an arbitration clause exists. The Court therefore rejected the objection to appointment and appointed a sole arbitrator to decide the disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458884