https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458887 Section 115 CPC confers revisional jurisdiction only for jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material irregularity, and it does not permit correction of every alleged factual or legal error. Where the dispute arose from an account opening form containing an arbitration clause and the trial court found the grievance against the stock broker fell within that agreement, Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operated mandatorily. Objections to arbitrability, the existence of the arbitration agreement, or the tribunal's competence had to be raised before the arbitral tribunal in the first instance. The revision petition was therefore not maintainable, and the referral to arbitration was upheld. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458887 Section 115 CPC confers revisional jurisdiction only for jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material irregularity, and it does not permit correction of every alleged factual or legal error. Where the dispute arose from an account opening form containing an arbitration clause and the trial court found the grievance against the stock broker fell within that agreement, Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operated mandatorily. Objections to arbitrability, the existence of the arbitration agreement, or the tribunal's competence had to be raised before the arbitral tribunal in the first instance. The revision petition was therefore not maintainable, and the referral to arbitration was upheld. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458887