https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458888 The Commission concluded that there were no competition concerns regarding the alleged abuse of dominance by the Opposite Parties in the pollution dust market. After reviewing the Information, it was determined that the market dynamics, including the entry of new entities and price increases, suggested sufficient competition. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, with no further action required against the Opposite Parties. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant, underscoring the absence of evidence to substantiate the allegations of dominance abuse. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458888 The Commission concluded that there were no competition concerns regarding the alleged abuse of dominance by the Opposite Parties in the pollution dust market. After reviewing the Information, it was determined that the market dynamics, including the entry of new entities and price increases, suggested sufficient competition. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, with no further action required against the Opposite Parties. The Secretary was instructed to communicate this decision to the Informant, underscoring the absence of evidence to substantiate the allegations of dominance abuse. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458888