<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1385 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458889</link>
    <description>Grant of exclusivity to a State transport undertaking for a specified bus route, and the fare structure for pilgrim services, were examined under the Competition Act, 2002. The exclusivity was linked to a government scheme framed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in the public interest to provide an adequate, economical and coordinated transport service, while the fares were stated to follow the applicable fare notification, including enhanced fares for ghat roads and festival occasions. On that basis, the arrangement was treated as a policy measure and the fare fixation did not disclose a distinct competition injury, so no contravention of Section 4 was made out and no interim restraint under Section 33 was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:12:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1385 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458889</link>
      <description>Grant of exclusivity to a State transport undertaking for a specified bus route, and the fare structure for pilgrim services, were examined under the Competition Act, 2002. The exclusivity was linked to a government scheme framed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in the public interest to provide an adequate, economical and coordinated transport service, while the fares were stated to follow the applicable fare notification, including enhanced fares for ghat roads and festival occasions. On that basis, the arrangement was treated as a policy measure and the fare fixation did not disclose a distinct competition injury, so no contravention of Section 4 was made out and no interim restraint under Section 33 was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>